Skip to content
Ceci est une traduction de commodite. La version anglaise est la version officielle et juridiquement contraignante. Voir la version anglaise
US-TNMEDIUM coverage

Tennessee ELVIS Act — Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024: AI Compliance Requirements

Tennessee's ELVIS Act (HB 2091/SB 2096, Public Chapter 588, signed March 21, 2024, effective July 1, 2024) was the first US law specifically protecting individuals' voices from AI replication without consent. Rather than creating a new chapter, it renamed and rebuilt the Personal Rights Protection Act of 1984 as the "Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024" (§ 47-25-1101) and inserted "voice" throughout. Three things make it unusually broad. First, § 47-25-1103(a) declares that EVERY individual — not only celebrities, and with no business-size threshold — "has a property right in the use of that individual's name, photograph, voice, or likeness in any medium in any manner." Second, the § 47-25-1102 definition of "voice" expressly reaches synthesis: "a sound in a medium that is readily identifiable and attributable to a particular individual, regardless of whether the sound contains the actual voice or a simulation of the voice of the individual." Third, § 47-25-1105(a) creates three separate liability prongs — (1) knowing commercial use in advertising or fundraising without consent; (2) publishing, performing, distributing, transmitting or otherwise making available a voice or likeness with knowledge the use was unauthorised; and (3) the tool prong, distributing or making available an algorithm, software, tool, technology, service or device whose "primary purpose or function" is producing a particular identifiable individual's photograph, voice or likeness, knowing it was unauthorised. PC 588 § 11 also lowered the knowledge bar for the exemption analysis from actual knowledge to "knowledge or reasonably should have known" (§ 47-25-1107(c)). Remedies are civil (§ 47-25-1106) and criminal (§ 39-14-152, a Class A misdemeanour).

Summary of publicly-available regulatory text as of 2026-08-25. Verify against current official sources before relying on this for compliance decisions. Not legal advice.

Key Facts

Effective Date

July 1, 2024

Maximum Penalty

Criminal: Class A misdemeanour under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-152 — up to 11 months 29 days in jail and/or a $2,500 fine. (PC 588 § 12 amended only § 39-14-152(g) to substitute the new Act name; the criminal offence itself predates and sits outside § 47-25-1106.) Civil under § 47-25-1106: injunctive relief, seizure/impoundment and destruction of infringing materials, actual damages plus the violator's profits attributable to the unauthorised use, and punitive damages where available. Enhanced remedy at § 47-25-1106(d)(2): three times actual damages plus reasonable attorney fees where a person knowingly uses or infringes the rights of a "member of the armed forces" — defined as a member of the US armed forces or of a reserve or Tennessee National Guard unit who is in, or was called into, active service. NOTE (R514): that treble provision is pre-existing Personal Rights Protection Act law, not something the ELVIS Act created; PC 588 does not contain it.

What Your Business Must Do

4 compliance requirements identified. Critical requirements carry the highest risk of enforcement action.

AI Voice & Likeness Consent

Critical

Obtain explicit written consent before using any AI tool to replicate, simulate, or produce any identifiable person's voice, image, or likeness. This applies to employees, customers, talent, and any third party.

Deadline: July 1, 2024

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-1105(a)(1)-(2) (liability for unauthorised commercial use and for publishing/distributing/making available a voice or likeness), as amended by 2024 Tenn. Pub. Ch. 588, § 6; "voice" defined at § 47-25-1102 (added by Pub. Ch. 588, § 3); property right at § 47-25-1103(a); civil remedies § 47-25-1106; criminal offence § 39-14-152.

Prohibit Unauthorized AI Replication Tools

High Priority

Do not develop, distribute, or make available any AI system, software, or service whose primary purpose is producing an individual's voice, image, or likeness without their permission. Review any AI tools in use to ensure they are not violating third-party rights.

Deadline: July 1, 2024

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-1105(a)(3) (added by 2024 Tenn. Pub. Ch. 588, § 6); civil remedies § 47-25-1106; criminal offence § 39-14-152.

Voice & Likeness Provenance Diligence (Constructive-Knowledge Standard)

High Priority

Keep evidence of where every synthetic or licensed voice, photograph and likeness in your content pipeline came from, and who authorised it. Public Chapter 588 § 11 amended Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-1107(c) so that liability can rest on what a person "reasonably should have known" about an unauthorised use, not only on actual knowledge — so "the vendor said it was cleared" is not by itself a defence if the circumstances should have prompted enquiry. Practical controls: require rights-provenance warranties and the underlying consent documentation from voice-model, stock and agency suppliers rather than a bare indemnity; record the identity of the consenting party and their authority to consent (individual; parent or legal guardian for a minor; executor, administrator, heirs or devisees for a deceased individual, per § 47-25-1105(a)); flag any asset marketed by reference to a named or recognisable person; and retain the record for as long as the content stays in distribution, since § 47-25-1105(a)(2) reaches continuing acts of making content available, not merely the initial publication.

Deadline: July 1, 2024

Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-1107(c) as amended by 2024 Tenn. Pub. Ch. 588, § 11 ("had knowledge or reasonably should have known of the unauthorized use"); consent parties § 47-25-1105(a); remedies § 47-25-1106; criminal offence § 39-14-152.

AI-Generated Content Policy

Medium Priority

Document your policy for AI-generated content that involves voice synthesis, image generation, or likeness replication. Include consent verification procedures and record-keeping for all authorizations.

Derived control supporting Tenn. Code Ann. § 47-25-1105(a) (2024 Tenn. Pub. Ch. 588, § 6); consent parties per § 47-25-1105(a)(1)-(3); exemptions § 47-25-1107(a).

Who Does This Apply To?

Applies to any person or business that (a) knowingly uses an individual's name, photograph, voice or likeness for advertising, merchandise, goods, services, or fundraising/solicitation purposes without the required consent (§ 47-25-1105(a)(1)); (b) publishes, performs, distributes, transmits, or otherwise makes available an individual's voice or likeness knowing the use was unauthorised (§ 47-25-1105(a)(2)); or (c) distributes, transmits, or otherwise makes available an algorithm, software, tool, other technology, service or device whose "primary purpose or function" is producing a particular, identifiable individual's photograph, voice or likeness, knowing it was unauthorised (§ 47-25-1105(a)(3)) — where the conduct occurs in or affects a Tennessee individual. "Voice" is defined at § 47-25-1102 to cover a sound readily identifiable and attributable to a particular individual "regardless of whether the sound contains the actual voice or a simulation of the voice," which is what brings AI synthesis squarely inside the Act. Section 47-25-1103(a) vests the property right in EVERY individual, so there is no celebrity, business-size or revenue threshold. Required consent comes from the individual, from a parent or legal guardian for a minor, or from the executor, administrator, heirs or devisees for a deceased individual. STANDING (§ 47-25-1106(f), added by Pub. Ch. 588 § 8): where a person holds an exclusive personal-services contract with a recording artist or an exclusive licence to distribute sound recordings capturing the individual's audio performances, an action to enforce may be brought by that person OR the individual — so record labels and exclusive distributors can sue in their own right. EXEMPTIONS are the five branches of § 47-25-1107(a), each conditioned on the use being protected by the First Amendment: (1) news, public affairs, or sports broadcast or account; (2) comment, criticism, scholarship, satire or parody; (3) a representation of the individual as the individual's self in an audiovisual work as defined under 17 U.S.C. § 101, UNLESS the work is intended to and does create the false impression that it is an authentic recording in which the individual participated; (4) fleeting or incidental use; and (5) an advertisement or commercial announcement for a work described in subsection (a). Branch (3) and its false-impression carve-back are the provision most often missed and are the direct hook for AI-generated "authentic recording" fakes. KNOWLEDGE: § 47-25-1107(c), as amended by Pub. Ch. 588 § 11, applies where the person "had knowledge or reasonably should have known of the unauthorized use" — a constructive-knowledge standard. Remedies are criminal (Class A misdemeanour, § 39-14-152) and civil (§ 47-25-1106: injunction, seizure/impoundment and destruction, actual damages plus the violator's profits, punitive damages where applicable, and § 47-25-1106(d)(2) treble damages plus attorney fees for knowing infringement of an active-service armed-forces or Tennessee National Guard member's rights).

Key Case Law & Precedent

Midler v. Ford Motor Co. (9th Cir. 1988)

US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988

Foundational right-of-publicity case holding that distinctive vocal style is protectable against unauthorized commercial imitation. Tennessee's ELVIS Act effectively codifies and extends Midler's right-of-voice doctrine to cover AI-generated synthesis of any individual's voice without consent, not just imitation by other humans.

Outcome: Bette Midler awarded damages against Ford for vocal-imitation advertisement

Case reference

Industry Playbooks covering Tennessee ELVIS Act — Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024

These industry playbooks include jurisdiction-specific checklist items and guidance for Tennessee ELVIS Act — Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024.

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Tennessee ELVIS Act — Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024 apply to my business?

Tennessee's ELVIS Act (HB 2091/SB 2096, Public Chapter 588, signed March 21, 2024, effective July 1, 2024) was the first US law specifically protecting individuals' voices from AI replication without consent. Rather than creating a new chapter, it… Use Aegis Firma's free scanner to get a personalized assessment in under 5 minutes.

What is the penalty for non-compliance?

The maximum penalty under Tennessee ELVIS Act — Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024 is: Criminal: Class A misdemeanour under Tenn. Code Ann. § 39-14-152 — up to 11 months 29 days in jail and/or a $2,500 fine. (PC 588 § 12 amended only § 39-14-152(g) to substitute the new Act name; the criminal offence itself predates and sits outside § 47-25-1106.) Civil under § 47-25-1106: injunctive relief, seizure/impoundment and destruction of infringing materials, actual damages plus the violator's profits attributable to the unauthorised use, and punitive damages where available. Enhanced remedy at § 47-25-1106(d)(2): three times actual damages plus reasonable attorney fees where a person knowingly uses or infringes the rights of a "member of the armed forces" — defined as a member of the US armed forces or of a reserve or Tennessee National Guard unit who is in, or was called into, active service. NOTE (R514): that treble provision is pre-existing Personal Rights Protection Act law, not something the ELVIS Act created; PC 588 does not contain it.. Fines are typically scaled by company size, severity of violation, and whether violations were willful or accidental.

How do I comply with Tennessee ELVIS Act — Ensuring Likeness, Voice, and Image Security Act of 2024?

The 4 requirements above cover the core obligations. The fastest path to compliance is: (1) conduct an AI risk assessment, (2) document your AI systems, (3) implement transparency disclosures where required. Aegis Firma generates all required documents automatically.

Official Source

https://publications.tnsosfiles.com/acts/113/pub/pc0588.pdf

Last updated: 2026-08-25 — verify at source before relying on this information.

Don't leave compliance to chance

Aegis Firma scans your AI tools, tells you exactly which regulations apply, and generates all required documents — in 30 minutes.

Start your free compliance scan