AI in education faces unique risks: minors' data, automated assessment, and learning analytics. Aegis Firma helps schools, universities, and EdTech platforms document compliance with EU AI Act, FERPA, and GDPR Article 8.
≤16
age requiring parental consent (GDPR)
High-risk
AI Act for academic evaluation AI
100%
of student data is sensitive under FERPA
€20M
GDPR fine for children's data violations
Educational institutions processing AI-related data about students face FERPA (US), GDPR Article 8 (children under 13/16), and the EU AI Act for learning management, academic integrity, and adaptive learning tools. Processing children's data requires heightened safeguards.
AI in academic assessment is high-risk
AI that determines grades, detects academic dishonesty, or evaluates students is classified as high-risk under EU AI Act Annex III §3. Conformity assessments are required.
Children's data — heightened protections
GDPR Article 8 requires parental consent for children under 13 (16 in some member states). AI processing children's data requires a DPIA and explicit legal basis beyond legitimate interest.
AI detection tools and accuracy
AI plagiarism and content detection tools have documented high false-positive rates for non-native English speakers. Adverse decisions based on flawed detection create GDPR and EU AI Act liability.
Learning analytics and profiling
Adaptive learning platforms that build student profiles for personalised content may constitute GDPR profiling, requiring explicit consent or legitimate interest assessments.
FERPA and third-party AI vendors
FERPA requires that AI vendors handling student education records have a School Official exception agreement that limits use of data to providing the contracted service.
Transparency to students and parents
Students (and parents of minors) must be told when AI is used in their educational assessment. EU AI Act Art. 50 and GDPR transparency principles both apply.
Student data inventory
Map all AI tools that process student data, document legal basis and data flows, and generate GDPR Article 30 records of processing activities for educational institutions.
DPIA templates for EdTech AI
Pre-built DPIA templates for adaptive learning, AI proctoring, and academic integrity tools — covering Article 35 requirements and children's data safeguards.
Children's consent management
Track and document parental consent for AI-related data processing under Article 8, with age verification workflows and consent withdrawal management.
FERPA third-party agreement tracker
Maintain School Official exception agreements with all AI vendors, track data use limitation clauses, and flag vendors that exceed permitted use.
Academic integrity AI governance
Document your AI detection processes, human review procedures, and appeal workflows to demonstrate fairness and compliance with due-process requirements.
Staff AI use policy
Generate and deploy an AI use policy specifically tailored to educational settings, covering use of generative AI in grading, feedback, and course creation.
Is an AI plagiarism detection tool high-risk under the EU AI Act?
If the detection tool's output is used to make or substantially influence a determination of academic misconduct, it is likely high-risk under Annex III §3(a). This means it requires a conformity assessment and that the institution must implement human oversight — meaning a trained educator reviews the AI's output before any disciplinary action is taken.
What is FERPA's "School Official" exception for AI vendors?
FERPA permits educational institutions to share student records with outside service providers when they perform institutional services, are under direct control of the institution, and are subject to data use limitations. AI vendors must agree in writing not to use student data for any purpose beyond providing the contracted service — e.g., they cannot use it to train their models.
What consent is needed for AI-personalised learning platforms?
For EU students under 13 (or under 16 in stricter member states), parental consent is required for any non-essential data processing under GDPR Article 8. Adaptive learning platforms typically require a DPIA and should use the minimum data necessary. Legitimate interest is generally not available for children's data.
Do teachers need special training on AI tools under the EU AI Act?
Yes. The EU AI Act Art. 26 requires deployers of high-risk AI to train staff who operate or oversee these systems. This means educators using AI assessment tools should receive training on the tool's limitations, how to interpret outputs, and when to override AI recommendations.
Cancel anytime · 7-day refund eligibility · no contracts