Skip to content

AI law comparison · Data verified 2026-08-22

California AB 2013 vs California AI Transparency Act

California AB 2013 and California AI Transparency Act are two of the 169 AI and data regulations Aegis Firma tracks. They have different scopes, effective dates, and penalties — and many businesses fall under both. Here is the side-by-side, drawn directly from the regulatory registry.

Find which laws apply to my business

Side by side

Attribute
California AB 2013
California AI Transparency Act
Region
US-CA
US-CA
Effective date
2026-01-01
2026-08-02
Enforcement begins
Who must comply
Applies to any person or entity that "designs, codes, produces, or substantially modifies" a generative AI system and makes it available to California residents. Retroactive: covers GenAI systems deployed since January 1…
The detection-tool + manifest/latent disclosure duties apply to "covered providers": persons or entities that create, code, or otherwise produce a publicly available generative AI system that has MORE THAN 1,000,000 mont…
Maximum penalty
No statutory penalty — AB 2013 specifies NO monetary penalty amount and names NO enforcer (the statute is silent on enforcement). There is no private right of action. Non-compliance would most likely be pursued by the California Attorney General (or district/city attorneys) under the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code §17200 et seq.); any monetary exposure derives from that general theory, not from AB 2013 itself. The prior "$5,000 per violation" figure was not in the statute. legal_review_pending.
$5,000 per violation (Bus. & Prof. Code § 22757.4(a)), recoverable in a civil action brought by the California Attorney General, a city attorney, OR a county counsel; a prevailing plaintiff also recovers reasonable attorney's fees and costs. The per-day accrual clause (§ 22757.4(b)) makes each day in violation a discrete violation for covered providers, large online platforms, and capture device manufacturers — GenAI hosting platforms are not named in that clause. Third-party licensees who violate § 22757.3(c) face injunctive relief and fees/costs only, not the $5,000 penalty (§ 22757.4(c)). No private right of action.
Compliance requirements
3 tracked
7 tracked
Enforcement actions on record
None on record yet
None on record yet
Data last verified
2026-08-22
2026-08-22

Summary of publicly available regulatory text. Verify against current official sources before relying on this for compliance decisions. Not legal advice.

The key difference

California AB 2013 takes effect first, so it is usually the more urgent of the two. California AB 2013 tracks 3 compliance requirements and California AI Transparency Act tracks 7. They are not interchangeable — meeting one does not discharge the other. The practical question is not which law is “stricter,” but which of them — or both — actually applies to your business.

US-CA

California AB 2013 — Generative AI Training Data Transparency Act

California AB 2013 requires any person or company that designs, codes, produces, or substantially modifies a generative AI system made available to California residents (since January 1, 2022) to publicly post a high-level summary of the training datasets used. This applies to businesses that build their own AI models or substantially customize foundation models — not just those using off-the-shelf AI APIs. If your p…

Full California AB 2013 requirements
US-CA

California SB 942 — AI Transparency Act (AI-Generated Content)

California SB 942 (California AI Transparency Act) requires "covered providers" — generative AI systems with more than 1,000,000 monthly visitors or users that are publicly accessible within California — to provide a free, publicly available AI-content detection tool, embed latent (hidden, machine-detectable) provenance disclosures in AI-generated image/video/audio content, and offer users a manifest (visible) disclo…

Full California AI Transparency Act requirements

Common questions

Could both California AB 2013 and California AI Transparency Act apply to my business?

Yes. California AB 2013 and California AI Transparency Act are separate regulations with separate scopes — a business can fall under both at once. California AB 2013 covers Applies to any person or entity that "designs, codes, produces, or substantially modifies" a generative AI system and makes it available to California residents… California AI Transparency Act covers The detection-tool + manifest/latent disclosure duties apply to "covered providers": persons or entities that create, code, or otherwise produce a publicly avai… If your operations meet both scopes, you must comply with both. Aegis Firma's free scan checks all 169 tracked regulations against your business profile so you do not have to read each law to find out.

Which has the higher maximum penalty — California AB 2013 or California AI Transparency Act?

California AB 2013: No statutory penalty — AB 2013 specifies NO monetary penalty amount and names NO enforcer (the statute is silent on enforcement). There is no private right of action. Non-compliance would most likely be pursued by the California Attorney General (or district/city attorneys) under the Unfair Competition Law (Bus. & Prof. Code §17200 et seq.); any monetary exposure derives from that general theory, not from AB 2013 itself. The prior "$5,000 per violation" figure was not in the statute. legal_review_pending. California AI Transparency Act: $5,000 per violation (Bus. & Prof. Code § 22757.4(a)), recoverable in a civil action brought by the California Attorney General, a city attorney, OR a county counsel; a prevailing plaintiff also recovers reasonable attorney's fees and costs. The per-day accrual clause (§ 22757.4(b)) makes each day in violation a discrete violation for covered providers, large online platforms, and capture device manufacturers — GenAI hosting platforms are not named in that clause. Third-party licensees who violate § 22757.3(c) face injunctive relief and fees/costs only, not the $5,000 penalty (§ 22757.4(c)). No private right of action. Penalty structures differ by regulator and violation type — read each law's full page for the cure periods and per-violation detail.

When does each law take effect?

California AB 2013 — effective 2026-01-01. California AI Transparency Act — effective 2026-08-02. Dates last verified against official sources on 2026-08-22 and 2026-08-22 respectively.

Related comparisons

See all law comparisons

Stop guessing which laws apply

Answer a short questionnaire about your business and Aegis Firma tells you exactly which of 169 regulations apply — and what each one requires you to do.

Start free compliance scan