Skip to content
هذه ترجمة للتسهيل فقط. النسخة الإنجليزية هي النسخة الرسمية والملزمة قانونيا. عرض النسخة الإنجليزية
US-FLMEDIUM coverage

Florida Advanced Technology Act (Ch. 2024-118 / SB 1680) — Government Technology Modernization Council: AI Compliance Requirements

Florida enacted Chapter 2024-118 (CS/CS/SB 1680, "Advanced Technology"), effective July 1, 2024. Verified via direct primary-source read of the enrolled bill text this cycle: it creates the Government Technology Modernization Council, an ADVISORY council within the Department of Management Services (DMS) that studies AI/data modernization, assesses AI-ethics reform needs, evaluates AI safety/security standards (including recommending — not mandating — disclosure of digital provenance for generative-AI images/audio), and reports annually to the Governor and Legislature by December 31. It separately criminalizes knowing possession, viewing, or creation of AI-generated child sexual abuse material (3rd-degree felony). The companion House bill, HB 1459, died (laid on table 2024-03-05) and never became law — it did NOT create binding vendor documentation, bias-audit, or human-in-the-loop requirements for state AI contractors, contrary to earlier drafts of this registry entry. No Florida statute currently imposes a general AI-vendor-compliance mandate on businesses selling AI to Florida government agencies (verified this cycle: Fla. Stat. § 501.174, sometimes cited for such a mandate, does not exist in the official Florida Statutes database as of this check). The "Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights" proposal (SB 482, 2026 session) DIED in House Messages on 2026-03-13 (Cycle 21, 2026-08-22: corrected a cross-entry staleness — the sibling `florida_no_ai_law` entry had already established this death via Cycle 9, but this entry's own text had not been updated to match and still called it "pending" months later) — it is not law. ROUND 504 (2026-08-25) CORRECTION AND UPDATE, verified this cycle on flsenate.gov bill records: the words "during a special session Gov. DeSantis called specifically for it" previously sat on the 2026-03-13 date and were WRONG — CS/SB 482 passed the Senate 35-2 on 2026-03-04 and died in House Messages on 2026-03-13 at the close of the REGULAR 2026 session. The special session came AFTERWARDS, and its refiled vehicle, SB 2D ("Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights," Sen. Brodeur, filed 2026-04-24, intended effective date 2026-07-01), passed the Senate 37-1 on 2026-04-28 and then DIED on 2026-04-29 in the House Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee — the House Speaker having said the chamber would not take it up because AI policy belongs at the federal level. Florida therefore rejected the same AI Bill of Rights TWICE in 2026; neither vehicle is law and no live path exists as of 2026-08-25. SCOPE POINTER (this entry is government-facing by name and content): Florida's enacted PRIVATE-sector AI and AI-adjacent duties — HB 919 political-ad disclaimers (§ 106.145), SB 1180 and Brooke's Law (§ 836.13, incl. the covered-platform 48-hour removal duty at § 836.13(6)), the Florida Digital Bill of Rights profiling/assessment/biometric duties (§§ 501.705, 501.713, 501.715, 501.72), § 540.08 likeness-in-advertising, and SB 484/ch. 2026-65 data-center tariffs — are modelled in the sibling `florida_no_ai_law` entry, not here.

Summary of publicly-available regulatory text as of 2026-08-25. Verify against current official sources before relying on this for compliance decisions. Not legal advice.

Key Facts

Effective Date

July 1, 2024

Maximum Penalty

No civil/administrative penalty regime currently applies to private AI vendors under this Act — the Government Technology Modernization Council has no enforcement power, only a study/recommendation mandate. Separately and unrelated to standard AI compliance: knowing possession, viewing, or creation of AI-generated CSAM is a 3rd-degree felony under the same chapter.

What Your Business Must Do

2 compliance requirements identified. Critical requirements carry the highest risk of enforcement action.

Monitor Government Technology Modernization Council Recommendations

Lower Priority

No Florida statute currently requires AI vendors to submit system documentation to state agencies or DMS. The Government Technology Modernization Council (created by Ch. 2024-118, within DMS) studies AI/data modernization and must report annual recommendations to the Governor and Legislature by December 31 each year; those recommendations could become the basis for future binding disclosure or procurement rules. If you sell AI-enabled products/services to Florida state or local government, monitor the Council's annual reports for proposed rule changes rather than treating any documentation duty as currently binding.

Ch. 2024-118, Laws of Florida (CS/CS/SB 1680) — creates the Government Technology Modernization Council (study/recommendation only, no vendor-facing mandate).

Monitor Pending Florida AI Legislation (Not Yet Law)

Lower Priority

No current Florida statute requires bias audits, fairness assessments, or human-in-the-loop review for AI systems used in Florida government decision-making (benefits, criminal justice, child welfare, employment) — this was proposed in HB 1459, which died in 2024 and never became law. The "Artificial Intelligence Bill of Rights" proposal (SB 482, 2026 session) also died — in House Messages on 2026-03-13, at the close of the regular session — and its special-session successor SB 2D died on 2026-04-29 in the House Information Technology Budget & Policy Subcommittee after passing the Senate 37-1 (both verified on flsenate.gov bill records in Round 504, 2026-08-25, which also corrected an earlier misstatement that the 2026-03-13 death occurred "during a special session"). No live vehicle for these provisions exists; do not treat their provisions as binding.

Recent Regulatory Guidance

guidance2024-07

Florida Government Technology Modernization Council — established by Ch. 2024-118 (SB 1680), effective July 1, 2024

Verified via direct WebFetch of the enrolled bill text this cycle: Ch. 2024-118 creates the Government Technology Modernization Council, an advisory council (per s. 20.03(7), F.S.) within the Department of Management Services. The Council must meet quarterly; recommend legislative/administrative actions for data modernization; assess the need for AI-ethics reforms and a possible state AI code of ethics; assess automated decision systems' and identity management's effects on residents' constitutional and legal rights; evaluate AI safety/security standards (including recommending digital-provenance disclosure standards for generative AI, as a recommendation, not a mandate); assess AI-enabled bad-actor risks; and evaluate digital-literacy curriculum needs. It must submit annual recommendations to the Governor and Legislature by December 31. The Council has no independent enforcement or rulemaking power of its own.

Key Case Law & Precedent

Estate of Lokken v. UnitedHealth Group, Inc. (D. Minn., filed 2023)

US District Court, District of Minnesota · 2023

Class action alleging UnitedHealth's nH Predict AI algorithm (used via subsidiary NaviHealth) wrongfully denied Medicare Advantage beneficiaries post-acute care, with an alleged 90% error rate overturned on appeal. Relevant here only as a national illustration of AI-driven benefits-eligibility risk in health coverage decisions — Florida's Government Technology Modernization Council is tasked with assessing automated decision systems' effects on residents' legal rights, of which this case is a prominent example, not a Florida-specific or DMS-cited precedent.

Outcome: CYCLE 5 (2026-08-22) date/outcome correction: the court PARTIALLY GRANTED UnitedHealth's motion to dismiss on 2025-02-13 (dismissed unjust-enrichment and bad-faith-insurance claims; allowed breach-of-contract and implied-covenant-of-good-faith claims to proceed) — not simply "denied" as previously stated, and not decided in 2024. A March 2026 discovery order required UnitedHealth to produce documents across 6 of 7 requested categories. Litigation remains ongoing; no settlement or final judgment as of this cycle.

Case reference

Frequently Asked Questions

Does Florida Advanced Technology Act (Ch. 2024-118 / SB 1680) — Government Technology Modernization Council apply to my business?

Florida enacted Chapter 2024-118 (CS/CS/SB 1680, "Advanced Technology"), effective July 1, 2024. Verified via direct primary-source read of the enrolled bill text this cycle: it creates the Government Technology Modernization Council, an ADVISORY… Use Aegis Firma's free scanner to get a personalized assessment in under 5 minutes.

What is the penalty for non-compliance?

The maximum penalty under Florida Advanced Technology Act (Ch. 2024-118 / SB 1680) — Government Technology Modernization Council is: No civil/administrative penalty regime currently applies to private AI vendors under this Act — the Government Technology Modernization Council has no enforcement power, only a study/recommendation mandate. Separately and unrelated to standard AI compliance: knowing possession, viewing, or creation of AI-generated CSAM is a 3rd-degree felony under the same chapter.. Fines are typically scaled by company size, severity of violation, and whether violations were willful or accidental.

How do I comply with Florida Advanced Technology Act (Ch. 2024-118 / SB 1680) — Government Technology Modernization Council?

The 2 requirements above cover the core obligations. The fastest path to compliance is: (1) conduct an AI risk assessment, (2) document your AI systems, (3) implement transparency disclosures where required. Aegis Firma generates all required documents automatically.

Official Source

https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2024/1680

Last updated: 2026-08-25 — verify at source before relying on this information.

Don't leave compliance to chance

Aegis Firma scans your AI tools, tells you exactly which regulations apply, and generates all required documents — in 30 minutes.

Start your free compliance scan